|
|||||||||
|
You are here: Carbon Capture and Storage >> UKCCSC project >> UKCCSC News
|
|||||||||
Section Contents |
UKCCSC News 19 Dec 2007Hi Folks,
Here are more
capture-ready-Christmas-crackers-for-your-conspicuous-consumption than
I’ve got fingers, so the numbering might be a bit dodgy. If only I’d
trained as an engineer…
1) Our very own Stuart Haszeldine has been going his bit for Public
Dissemination, you can see the results in these multimedia displays
(which means ‘on a computer’ as far as I can tell). They report an EPSRC-funded project
that involves Heriot-Watt University and the BGS, as well as the University
of Edinburgh and industrial partners. The media coverage may not make this entirely clear... BBC with link to radio clip:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/7123936.stm
Scotsman
http://thescotsman.scotsman.com/scotland.cfm?id=1885152007 STV News
http://www.stv.tv/content/news/headlines/display.html?id=opencms:/news/Scientists_examine_carbon_dioxide_reduct_2007120 Daily Mail
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/technology/technology.html?in_article_id=499360&in_page_id=1965
2) The Bali talks were either a resounding success or a total
failure, depending on the outcome you’d hoped for, I guess. The
following article has a readable summary with a research slant:
“The agreed text lacks specific targets for reducing CO2 emissions,
though it does acknowledge that “deep cuts” will be needed. But as
everybody now knows the US again seemed content to play the villain and
to block 25-40% target cuts by 2020. In reality the whole fortnight of
jousting between 190 governments was not a great deal more than a
loosening up exercise for the negotiations to come over the next two
years or so.”
http://www.sciencebusiness.net/wordpress/2007/12/18/research-may-have-to-take-the-strain/ 3) Anyone fancy a holiday in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania? No, I thought not. If you change your mind the Seventh Annual Conference on Carbon
Capture & Sequestration will be held there, May 5 - 8, 2008, hosted
by NETL. http://www.carbonsq.com/ 4) Some capture news for once, involving an “ammonia-based solution” suitable for retro-fitting or new build: “Powerspan Licenses CO2 Capture Technology for Coal-Fueled Power Plants from the U.S. Department of Energy” CNN
“The "ECO2(TM)" process is a post-combustion CO2 capture process for
conventional power plants that is differentiated from other approaches
by its simpler capital equipment design and significantly lower energy
consumption.” http://money.cnn.com/news/newsfeeds/articles/prnewswire/NEM05303122007-1.htm 5) Something for the social acceptance people:
“EarthFirst! blockade at coal-fired power plant in Rotterdam, NL”
“The term 'Capture Ready preparation' used by E.on is a fraud. A
carbon-capturing power plant will use between 24 and 40 percent of its
produced energy on the capture process. It must therefore burn more
coal to provide the same amount of output energy as a non
carbon-capturing power plant.
The type of plant E.on is about to build has proven to be extremely
unsuitable for carbon storage. … E.on's promise to start capturing
carbon 'as soon as it is technically and commercially viable' is
therefore completely pointless and has only resulted in an empty spot
on the blueprints, reserved for a future capturing installation.” http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2007/12/387350.html 5) “Ottawa must back oilsands' carbon plan without haste” Financial
Post, Canada “An alliance of 15 Canadian oilsands, chemical and power companies
proposed Monday a multi-billion-dollar plan to capture and store
greenhouse gases in what would be the country's single-largest carbon
dioxide-reduction initiative.
They say they are willing to pay their part -- billions, in fact -- to
get this off the ground.” http://www.financialpost.com/story.html?id=141669 6) Jon Gibbins sent a report by the (UK) Council for Science and
Technology entitled “Strategic decision making for technology”, The
remit was to identify technologies that will make an impact in 5 – 10
years and are worthy of investment. There is a section on CCS which
concludes:
“The window of opportunity in which Government action can secure the
UK’s lead on CCS is, therefore, narrow. Heavy investment by other
nations means the Government must act with urgency if the UK is to
sustain a position of leadership. A cross-Government approach involving
BERR, Defra, and the
Energy Technologies Institute will be important.”
There is a web-page, but it just says that the report will appear here
in the autumn. Better hurry up then! http://www2.cst.gov.uk/cst/business/strategic_focus.shtml 7) If you are looking for a job, try the following, the University
of Leeds is seeking to make three Research Council UK Fellowship
appointments, including:
"CO2 Sequestration & Utilisation (Job ref 312275) - The Fellowship
will focus on interdisciplinary research critical to either the
geological sequestration of CO2 within the Faculty of the Environment
or the "re-use" of CO2 via novel chemical processes within the Faculty
of Mathematics and Physical Sciences (MAPS).” http://www.see.leeds.ac.uk/vacancies/index.htm 8) GHGT-9 will be in Washington DC, 16 – 20th November 2008. Abstracts
will be accepted up to March 28, 2008. http://mit.edu/ghgt9/papers/index.html 9) And following on from the last issue of News, Hilary Clinton’s
website is below, along with her energy manifesto, which as green as
grass. It contains the following quote:
“To accelerate the development of this important technology, Hillary
would put immediate funding towards 10 large scale carbon capture and
storage projects that utilize a range of coal types, power plant types,
and storage locations. She will move quickly to develop the regulatory
framework to ensure that carbon sequestration can be done safely and
reliably. And she will require all new coal plants to be capable of
adding capture and storage technology when it becomes commercially
available” www.hillaryclinton.com/files/pdf/poweringamericasfuture.pdf www.hillaryclinton.com/ 10) And your reward for reading this far, is the following quote
concerning the use of seaweed as a long-term carbon store: “In addition to storing carbon, seaweed would need to be used to
produce clean-burning biofuels, thereby ensuring the carbon dioxide
isn't simply recycled back into the air as it would be if the seaweed
is eaten.” Is this as daft as it sounds, or have I missed something? http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5gP5gSLJdrDNV8lxfwJisS6L8h9hgD8TE3GMG0 11) Oh, and “Sustainable Energy UK” conference in Oxford, May 13-14th, has
extended the deadline for paper and poster abstracts to January 7th. So
you can spend Xmas re-writing the abstract you hurried off for the
already-extended deadline last week… Details from Jennifer.otoadese@ouce.ox.ac.uk Seasonal greetings, have a good holiday Mark |
||||||||
|
|||||||||