|
|||||||||
|
You are here: Carbon Capture and Storage >> UKCCSC project >> UKCCSC News
|
|||||||||
Section Contents |
UKCCSC News 15 October 2007Hi Folks,
Sorry to fill your in-trays with News bulletins, but the first piece
of news may be of immediate interest to those with political
inclinations.
After the UK Government’s announcement that only post-combustion
capture CCS schemes would be eligible for the long-awaited competition
(see last CCS News), there has been an immediate reaction from the
power companies:
1) Backlash against carbon capture plan, Financial Times
“Several energy groups led by Centrica are preparing to challenge a
government plan for subsidising low-emission power generation, accusing
ministers of poor consultation and potentially wasting taxpayers’
money.
John Hutton, the business and enterprise secretary, announced on
Tuesday that the government would subsidise only one “carbon capture
and storage” power plant, to be chosen through a competition among
energy suppliers.
However, he drew fierce criticism from sections of the industry and the
carbon markets by stipulating that the support would be awarded only to
companies using “post-combustion” carbon capture techniques at a
coal-fired plant. The result is that many companies’ plans have been
suddenly made ineligible.” http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/028e0a9a-7838-11dc-8e4c-0000779fd2ac.html
(some readers may see humour in the advert for a Hummer embedded in
the above article. Sadly I got a different advert when I went back to
the site)
For more of the same see:
http://www.environmental-finance.com/onlinews/1011ukg.html Or even here:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/money/main.jhtml?xml=/money/2007/10/12/cngreen112.xml Actually, it has been suggested that so many of the proposals are
now ineligible that there is no longer a competition, as such. Oh dear. 2) 5% of world CO2 emissions are from the cement industry -
The unheralded polluter: cement industry comes clean on its impact, Guardian
“No company will make carbon-neutral cement any time soon. The
manufacturing process depends on burning vast amounts of cheap coal to
heat kilns to more than 1,500C. It also relies on the decomposition of
limestone, a chemical change which frees carbon dioxide as a
byproduct.”
CCS is mentioned as a potential solution, but you need to read a
long way down the article. It sounds like a problem looking for a
solution – somebodies next research project perhaps? http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2007/oct/12/climatechange
|
||||||||
|
|||||||||